Each of these engagements involved a Microsoft GCC or GCC High migration, configured with CMMC alignment in mind from the start. The environments are different. The outcome each client describes is the same: a migration that held up once compliance work actually began.
Liberty Alliance
Working with Agile IT was a great experience from start to finish. Your team’s expertise in Microsoft GCC High, Intune, and configuration helped ensure our environment was configured correctly and aligned with our compliance objectives.
The guidance and support you provided throughout the deployment gave us confidence that our Microsoft 365 GCC High environment is positioned to support our journey toward achieving CMMC Level 2 certification. Your responsiveness, technical knowledge, and willingness to work through challenges made this a smooth implementation.
We appreciate the partnership and look forward to working with Agile IT on future projects.
Airtech Supply
Agile IT didn’t just migrate us to Microsoft GCC High—they delivered a CMMC-aligned environment with industry best practices already in place, saving us countless hours of configuration and helping us establish a secure foundation.
Affordable Engineering Services
Professional, Responsive, Attentive and just a pleasure to work with. The migration services were explained and executed with attention focused on us the end user. AgileIT took a very complex and stressful situation and made us feel at ease at each level of the project.
Very knowledgeable and provided many resources to assist with migration. Would recommend to any company wanting to migrate to GCC or GCC High.
Practical guidance on CMMC, GCC High, FedRAMP, and Azure Government for defense contractors.
We’ve had a strong relationship with Agile IT for 2 years. The team takes their jobs seriously. They’re knowledgeable in many areas and transparent about what falls outside their expertise.
Agile IT is well-founded in cloud computing and cloud engineering, so I was confident to move forward with the project.
We were looking for the people who had the most success and experience with this type of migration. From signing on with them in the beginning, our working relationship with Agile IT was frictionless.
The team was very helpful on the technical side.
We’ve had a strong relationship with Agile IT for 2 years. The team takes their jobs seriously. They’re knowledgeable in many areas and transparent about what falls outside their expertise.
Agile IT is well-founded in cloud computing and cloud engineering, so I was confident to move forward with the project.
We were looking for the people who had the most success and experience with this type of migration. From signing on with them in the beginning, our working relationship with Agile IT was frictionless.
The team was very helpful on the technical side.
Agile IT works with defense contractors, aerospace organizations, legal firms, and government entities working through CMMC compliance,
GCC High licensing, Azure Government migrations, FedRAMP authorization, and Microsoft 365 for regulated environments. The case studies
in this library cover real defense contractor cybersecurity engagements across CMMC Level 1 self-attestation, CMMC Level 2 certification,
DFARS 7012 compliance obligations, and federal cloud migrations. Each engagement reflects real compliance decisions, real environments,
and real outcomes. If you’re evaluating a compliance partner, the proof is here.
GCC High Licensing and G3 vs. G5 Start With CMMC Scope Microsoft licensing is the last decision in the chain, and it is the one most organizations make first. The contract, the data, and the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Assessment Scope decide the Microsoft cloud and the licensing tier inside
Most CUI scope decisions get made in one meeting, by whoever is in the room, and documented afterward to match. That boundary holds until a C3PAO asks who justified it. The designating agency decides what qualifies. Data flow decides what’s in scope. The Microsoft environment follows both, not the reverse.
Assessment failures rarely start with missing controls. They start with decisions no one wrote down. CMMC Level 2 assessments that stall inside a Microsoft environment tend to start from the same baseline, not a shortage of controls. Conditional access is enforced, audit logging is active, and identity governance is running
Phase II certification is paused. DFARS 252.204-7012, 7019, and 7020 are not. Self-assessments, SPRS scores, and 72-hour incident reporting remain contractually binding, and with no assessor in the room, the accuracy of your score matters more, not less.
CMMC Level 1 and Level 2 don’t follow the same logic, and treating them as steps on the same ladder is where scoping goes wrong. This guide breaks down what triggers each level, how the assessments differ, and the decisions defense contractors need to make before either one gets scheduled.
Learn how defense contractors can perform secure tenant-to-tenant migrations while protecting CUI and meeting DFARS and CMMC requirements.
GCC High Licensing and G3 vs. G5 Start With CMMC Scope Microsoft licensing is the last decision in the chain, and it is the one most organizations make first. The contract, the data, and the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Assessment Scope decide the Microsoft cloud and the licensing tier inside
Most CUI scope decisions get made in one meeting, by whoever is in the room, and documented afterward to match. That boundary holds until a C3PAO asks who justified it. The designating agency decides what qualifies. Data flow decides what’s in scope. The Microsoft environment follows both, not the reverse.
Assessment failures rarely start with missing controls. They start with decisions no one wrote down. CMMC Level 2 assessments that stall inside a Microsoft environment tend to start from the same baseline, not a shortage of controls. Conditional access is enforced, audit logging is active, and identity governance is running
Phase II certification is paused. DFARS 252.204-7012, 7019, and 7020 are not. Self-assessments, SPRS scores, and 72-hour incident reporting remain contractually binding, and with no assessor in the room, the accuracy of your score matters more, not less.
CMMC Level 1 and Level 2 don’t follow the same logic, and treating them as steps on the same ladder is where scoping goes wrong. This guide breaks down what triggers each level, how the assessments differ, and the decisions defense contractors need to make before either one gets scheduled.
Learn how defense contractors can perform secure tenant-to-tenant migrations while protecting CUI and meeting DFARS and CMMC requirements.
Every engagement above started the same way, a contractor facing an audit, a deadline, or a contract requirement they couldn’t risk missing. If that’s where you are, start with an assessment of your Microsoft environment.
